|
February
28, 2001
Dear Members of the House Labor and Commerce Committee:
On behalf of our 5,000 members at 28 Illinois community colleges,
I request you vote "do pass" on HB 655. HB 655 will repeal that
part of HB 206 which took away bargaining rights for employees in
the City Colleges of Chicago.
No public hearings were held on the amendment to HB 206 when HB
206 was approved by the House and Senate in 1995. The amendment
to HB 206 affecting City Colleges was approved by both legislative
bodies within a 12-hour period on the last day of the session.
No other Illinois community college had its bargaining rights taken
away. Why are City Colleges employees singled out as second class
citizens? Why are we denied equal rights under the Illinois Constitution?
HB 206 was justified by the educational "crisis" in Chicago Public
Schools. But there is no "crisis" in the City Colleges and the reform
legislation of HB 206 was never intended to apply to City Colleges.
Three of the City Colleges branches, Olive-Harvey, Malcolm X and
Daley, were recently granted an unprecedented 10-year accreditation
by the North Central Association of Schools and Colleges.
In the City
Colleges, employees earned their right to collective bargaining
by years of effort. In 1995 when the legislature passed HB 206,
30 years of free collective bargaining about non-economic matters
was declared "null and void" and City Colleges employees were "prohibited"
from discussing class size, calendar, work load, hours of employment
and other subjects with the City Colleges Board. Why were these
rights which we earned over 30 years taken away? The legislature
didn't give us these rights; the legislature should not deny us
the rights we earned without the legislature's help by free collective
bargaining with the City Colleges Board.
HB 655 has bipartisan support. Three Republican House members have
become co-sponsors along with 13 Democrats. The Republicans include
Eileen Lyons, Angelo Saviano and Roger McAuliffe.
By voting
"do pass" on HB 655 you will demonstrate you support the right of
educational employees to free collective bargaining, and that you
oppose discriminatory laws unfairly aimed at the employees of City
Colleges. Other City Colleges unions which support repeal of HB
206 include Dick Phelan of the Operating Engineers, the International
Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the SEIU, AFSCME, and the Firemen
and Oilers. All of us represent City Colleges employees.
Thank you
for your time. If you have questions, I would be pleased to answer
them. Submitted
by Norman G. Swenson, President, NGS:lmw
|
|
The South African
Municipal Workers Union (SAMWU) calls for this year's World Water
Day to be declared a day of mourning for the millions of people
who are sick and dying as a result of not having access to water.
The United Nations chose "Water and Health" as the theme for World
Water Day on Thursday 22nd March 2001. Nothing could be more ironic
in South Africa and across the African continent. People here are
becoming more and more unhealthy and dying prematurely because water
is now a commodity that only the rich can afford.
Behind the
inevitable glib and cheery public relations turning on of taps for
the first time on Thursday, lies the shocking reality that worldwide,
more than five million people, most of them children, die every
year from illnesses caused from drinking poor quality water.
A shocking
new survey has revealed that much of the blame for this must be
laid at the feet of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund
(IMF). Their water privatization and full cost recovery policies
have been imposed as conditions for IMF loans in over 12 African
countries. Negotiated under the IMF's new Poverty Reduction and
Growth Facility (PRGF), the conditions are leading to people being
cut off from water more than ever before.
The Africa Policy and Information Centre has reported that water
privatization is making water less accessible and less affordable.
People are resorting to unsafe water sources. This is clearly evident
in South Africa where the amount of cholera infections is close
approaching 70 000!
In Ghana, the result of forcing the poor to pay "market rate tariffs"
for water means that most Ghanains can no longer afford water at
all. Only 36 percent of the rural population have access to safe
water and 11 percent have adequate
|
sanitation
within the existing system. Water is also scarce in the capital,
Accra. In poor areas of Accra, families are paying almost half the
daily wage for 10 buckets of water!
In Angola,
there is an agreement that water prices should rise regularly so
that the company delivering water can make a "reasonable" profit.
In Benin, Tanzania, Guinea-Bissau, Niger and Rwanda water privatization
must be completed by the end of this year for governments to qualify
for loans. In Sao Tome and Principe, there will be no further government
subsidy of water in the run up to privatization.
This is clearly
ridiculous. In some of the most poverty stricken countries in Africa,
unemployed and homeless people who cannot even afford a crust of
bread now and then, are expected to fork out one months food money
for a few buckets of water! In the last month alone in Cape Town
and Johannesburg, thousands of people have been disconnected from
water they could not afford to pay for. Even permanently employed
workers are being forced to choose between food, electricity or
water. This terrible reality makes a mockery of human rights day.
Even in so-called
first world countries like New Zealand, people are being forced
to take to the streets against the commercialization of water. Water
activists in Auckland will be protesting on World Water Day against
the City Council. The demands of the activists are that all commercialization
be stopped and water be restored to the public service after hundreds
of families were disconnected from water they could no longer afford.
|